On the right track? Appraising twenty-five years of railway reforms in Belgium (1999-2024)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54195/plc.21812

Keywords:

Liberalisation policies , Railway sector , Infrastructure management , Autonomy , Control

Abstract

This paper examines a key but neglected dimension of the European policy of railway liberalising: the separation between infrastructure management and transportation activities. Drawing upon Verhoest et al.’s (2004) multi-dimensional approach to autonomy and control, it assesses the autonomy of the Belgian railway infrastructure manager, Infrabel, through a longitudinal case-study (1999–2024) based on documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews. Next to its original empirical focus, this study brings a twofold contribution to debates on the national implementation of EU liberalisation policies. By highlighting the nuanced, dynamic, and negotiated nature of Infrabel’s autonomy through time, it reaffirms the methodological relevance of in-depth case studies on bureaucratic autonomy—next to comparative survey questionnaires. Moreover, it demonstrates that the horizon of competition underlying liberalisation policies also influences railway reforms in countries such as Belgium, where this sector has hitherto not been privatised or liberalised (i.e. effectively submitted to competition).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrien, A., Frénéa, T., Grommen, G., Pierre, A., Tambour, Y., & Piron, D. (2024). Une restructuration qui va bon train : analyse de la libéralisation du secteur ferroviaire en Belgique du point de vue d’Infrabel. Administration Publique (Trimestriel), 47(1), 27–44.

Belgian Chamber of Representatives. (2021). Response from the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Mobility to written question n° 55-222: Infrabel – Staff. https://www.lachambre.be/QRVA/pdf/55/55K0051.pdf.

Belgian Federal Government. (2011). Coalition agreement. https://www.lachambre.be/kvvcr/pdf_sections/searchlist/Accord_de_Gouvernement_1er_decembre_2011.pdf.

Belgian Federal Government. (2025). Coalition agreement. https://www.belgium.be/sites/default/files/resources/publication/files/Accord_gouvernemental-Bart_De_Wever_fr.pdf.

Bezes, P., & Jeannot, G. (2018). Autonomy and managerial reforms in Europe: Let or make public managers manage? Public Administration, 96(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12361.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Clifton, J., Comín, F., & Díaz Fuentes, D. (Eds.). (2007). Transforming public enterprise in Europe and North America: Networks, integration and transnationalization. Palgrave.

Court of Audit. (2016). Evaluation of the implementation of management contracts concluded with SNCB, Infrabel and SNCB-Holding. https://www.ccrek.be/sites/default/files/Docs/2016_09_SNCB_ContratsGestion.pdf.

De Broux, P. O. (2011). Le droit des industries de réseaux (1830–2010) : une histoire de l’évolution du rôle de l’État fondatrice d’un droit du service public. [Docotral dissertation, Université Saint-Louis-Bruxelles.] DIAL.pr. https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/object/boreal:173472.

De Visscher, C., Fallon, C., Piron, D., & Schram, F. (forthcoming). Civil service and public administrations in Belgium. In M. Reuchamps, M. Brans, P. Meier, & É. Van Haute (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Belgian Politics. Oxford University Press.

Della Porta, D., & Keating, M. (2008). Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938.

Deville, X., & Verduyn, F. (2012). Implementation of EU legislation on rail liberalisation in Belgium, France, Germany and The Netherlands. National Bank of Belgium Working Paper, 221, 1–154. https://www.nbb.be/en/publications-research/publications/all-publications/implementation-

eu-legislation-rail.

Di Giulio, M. (2016). Reshaping state structure and strategy: The reform of railway policy in Germany and Italy. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(3), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1004084.

Dyrhauge, H. (2013). EU railway policy-making: On track? Palgrave.

Dyrhauge, H. (2022). Transforming a steam train: A historical institutionalist analysis of EU railway policy. Journal of European Integration, 44(6), 855–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.2012465.

Engartner, T. (2010). German rail reform: Railway policy realigned for the capital markets. International Journal of Public Policy, 6(1–2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2010.031207.

Evrard, Z., & Piron, D. (2025). Décoder l’Arizona : l’accélération d’un néolibéralisme aux accents autoritaires. Politique – Revue de Débats. https://www.revuepolitique.be/decoder-larizona-lacceleration-dun-neoliberalisme-aux-accents-autoritaires/.

Gracos, I. (2013). Grèves et conflictualité sociale en 2012. II. Secteur public et questions européennes. Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP, 2174–2175(9), 7–86. https://doi.org/10.3917/cris.2174.0007.

Gutiérrez-Hita, C., & Ruiz-Rua, A. (2019). Competition in the railway passenger market: The challenge of liberalization. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 20(2), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1783591719858737.

Hall, D. (2002). EU competition policies and public services. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 8(2), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/102425890200800205.

Héritier, A., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2008). The shadow of hierarchy and new modes of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X08000755.

Hermann, Ch., & Flecker, J. (Eds.). (2012). Privatization of public services: Impacts for employment, working conditions, and service quality in Europe. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203119600.

Hermann, C., & Verhoest, K. (2012). The process of liberalisation, privatisation and marketisation. In C. Hermann & J. Flecker (Eds.), Privatization of public services: Impacts for employment, working conditions, and service quality in Europe (pp. 6–32). Routledge.

Infrabel. (2018). Annual report to shareholders (2017). https://infrabel.be/sites/default/files/generated/files/report/rapport_annuel_infrabel_2017_fr.pdf.

Infrabel. (2023). Consolidated financial statements. https://fr.ftp.opendatasoft.com/infrabel/I-FBA/ComptesAnnuels_Jaarrekening/Data_FR_ComptesAnnuelsConsolides_2022.pdf.

Kaeding, M. (2008). Lost in translation or ahead: The transposition of EU directives across states. European Union Politics, 9(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116507085959.

Kestel, L. (2018). En marche forcée : une chronique de la libéralisation des transports. Raisons d’Agir.

Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007). Understanding public policy through its instruments—From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x.

Lodge, M. (2003). Institutional choice and policy transfer: Reforming British and German railway regulation. Governance, 16(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00212.

Maggetti, M., & Verhoest, K. (2014). Unexplored aspects of bureaucratic autonomy: A state of the field and ways forward. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314524680.

Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425031.

Meyer, R. E., & Hammerschmid, G. (2010). The degree of decentralization and individual decision making in central government human resource management: A European comparative perspective. Public Administration, 88(2), 455–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01798.x.

Olsen, S. (2007). Fragmentation and coordination in the Scandinavian railway sector. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852307081146.

Ospina, S. M., Esteve, M., & Lee, S. (2018). Assessing qualitative studies in public administration research. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 593–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12837.

Piron, D. (2024). Governing public investment in Europe: The politics of off-balance-sheet policymaking, the rise of Eurostat and contrasted regional policies in Belgium. Competition & Change, 28(3–4), 494–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294241242843.

Piron, D., & Evrard, Z. (Eds.). (2023). Le(s) néolibéralisme(s) en Belgique – Cadre macroéconomique, applications sectorielles et formes de résistance. Academia.

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Ross, J. (1998). Linking Europe: Transport policies and politics in the European Union. Praeger Publishers.

Salento, A., & Pesare, G. (2016). Liberalisation and value extraction: The trajectory of railway in the neo-liberal state. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 9(2), 466–494. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v9i2p466.

Schmitt, C. (2013). The Janus face of Europeanisation: Explaining cross-sectoral differences in public utilities. West European Politics, 36(3), 547–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.749651.

Schwartz-Shea, P. (2014). Judging quality: Evaluative criteria and epistemic communities. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (2nd ed., pp. 120–146). Routledge.

Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2012). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203854907.

Smith, M. P. (2005). States of liberalization: Redefining the public sector in integrated Europe. State University of New York Press.

Solina, K., & Abramović, B. (2022). Effects of railway market liberalisation: European Union perspective. Sustainability, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084657.

Van de Walle, S. (2008). What services are public? What aspects of performance are to be ranked? The case of “services of general interest”. International Public Management Journal, 11(3), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490802301260.

Van der Herten, B., Van Meerten, M., & Verveurgt, G. (Eds.). (2001). Sporen in Belgie: 175 jaar spoorwegen, 75 jaar NMBS. Leuven University Press.

Verhoest, K., Peters, B. G., Bouckaert, G., & Verschuere, B. (2004). The study of organisational autonomy: A conceptual review. Public Administration and Development, 24(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.316.

Verhoest, K., Roness, P. G., Verschuere, B., Rubecksen, K., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2010). Autonomy and control of state agencies: Comparing states and agencies. Palgrave.

Yesilkagit, K., & van Thiel, S. (2008). Political influence and bureaucratic autonomy. Public Organization Review, 8(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-008-0054-7.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-11

How to Cite

Piron, D., Andrien, A., Frénéa, T., Grommen, G., Pierre, A., & Tambour, Y. (2025). On the right track? Appraising twenty-five years of railway reforms in Belgium (1999-2024). Politics of the Low Countries, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.54195/plc.21812