Between top-down constraints and polycentricity opportunities: the role of local governance systems in maintaining or overcoming climate lock-in dynamics in Wallonia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54195/plc.21813Keywords:
local energy governance, Polycentric governance, Climate delay, Lock-in, Qualitative methodsAbstract
Between 2008 and 2023, local energy governance gained importance in Belgium. At the same time, it has been characterised by climate delay discourses, mirroring carbon-intensive lock-ins. Against this backdrop, this article questions whether local governance structures can contribute to overcoming these lock-ins, using municipalities of Wallonia as case studies. First, it identifies two local governance systems: polycentric and top-down. Second, it showcases a typology of climate delay discourses that are present in both governance systems. These discourses uncover behavioural and institutional lock-in dynamics. Third, it analyses whether municipalities with a polycentric governance system create an institutional and political environment that may overcome lock-in dynamics compared to municipalities with a top-down governance system. This article shows that local governance systems play a decisive role in overcoming or maintaining lock-in dynamics, which have so far been analysed only at higher institutional levels. Our findings demonstrate that while polycentric governance does not eliminate lock-ins, it creates institutional conditions that allow local actors and knowledge to counter them. This nuances the view of polycentric governance as inherently superior, suggesting instead that its value lies in enabling context-specific pathways and multiple entry points for action. Overall, municipal structures and the lock-ins they sustain are central to the limits and possibilities of climate transformation. We therefore argue that future research should move beyond policies to examine how governance systems shape climate trajectories.
Downloads
References
Bell, S., & Hindmoor, A. (2009). Rethinking governance: The centrality of the state in modern society. Cambridge University Press.
Benulic, K. S., Kropf, M., Linnér, B. O., & Wibeck, V. (2021). The meaning of leadership in polycentric climate action. Environmental Politics, 00(00), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1970087.
Brulle, Robert J. (2020). Denialism: Organized opposition to climate change action in the United States. In David Konisky (Ed.) Handbook of Environmental Policy (pp. 328–341). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Brummer, V. (2018). Community energy – benefits and barriers: A comparative literature review of Community Energy in the UK, Germany and the USA, the benefits it provides for society and the barriers it faces. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94, 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.013
Callens, I., & Duquesne, M. (2018). Les enjeux énergétiques et les communes. Union des Villes et Communes de Wallonie.
Collard, F. (2016). La transition énergétique. Courrier Hebdomadaire Du CRISP, 36(2321), 5–44.
Coman, R., Crespy, A., Louault, F., Morin, J-F., Pillet, J-B., & Van Haute, E. (2016). Méthodes de la science politique. De la question de départ à l’analyse des données. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur.
Covenant of Mayors (2019), Objectives and Scope. https://www.eumayors.eu/about/covenant-initiative/objectives-and-scope.html.
de Becker, A. (2013). Local government in Belgium: A “Catch 22” between autonomy and hierarchy. In C. Panara & M. Varney (Eds.), Local government in Europe (pp. 26–51). Routledge.
Dorsch, M. J., & Flachsland, C. (2017). A polycentric approach to global climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 17(2), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00400.
Haupt, W., Eckersley, P., Irmisch, J., & Kern, K. (2023). How do local factors shape transformation pathways towards climate-neutral and resilient cities? European Planning Studies, 31(9), 1903–1925. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2147394.
Haynes, P. (2014). Combining the strengths of qualitative comparative analysis with cluster analysis for comparative public policy research: With reference to the policy of economic convergence in the Euro Currency Area. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(9), 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.880849.
Hopkins, R. (2008). The Transition Handbook (free edit version). Chelsea Green. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/244887916_The_transition_handbook_from_oil_dependency_to_local_resilience_by_Rob_Hopkins.
International Cooperative Alliance (ICA). Cooperative identity, values and principles. https://ica.coop/en/cooperatives/what-is-a-cooperative.
Jordan, A., Huitema, D., Van Asselt, H., & Forster, J. (2018). Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? Cambridge University Press.
Jylhä, K. M., Strimling, P., & Rydgren, J. (2020). Climate Change Denial among Radical Right-Wing Supporters. Sustainability, 12, 1–15.
Klitkou, A., Bolwig, S., Hansen, T., & Wessberg, N. (2015). The role of lock-in mechanisms in transition processes: The case of energy for road transport. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.005.
Lamb. W. F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S., Roberts, J. T., Capstick, S., Creutzig, F., Minx, J. C., Müller-Hanssen, F., Culhane, T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability, 3(17), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13.
Lejeune, C. (2015). Manuel d’analyse qualitative. Analyser sans compter ni classer (1st edition). De Boeck.
Mey, F., & Diesendorf, M. (2018). Who owns an energy transition? Strategic action fields and community wind energy in Denmark. Energy Research & Social Science, 35, 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.044.
Morrison, T. H. (2021). Polycentricity. In J. F. Morin & A. Orsini (Eds.), Essential Concepts of global environmental governance (2nd edition, pp. 188–191). Earthscan, Routledge.
Oreskes, N. (2012). Les marchands de doutes. Editions Le Pommier.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004.
Pastor, D.A. (2010). Cluster Analysis. In G.R. Hancock & R.O. Mueller (2010) The Reviewer’s Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences. New York: Routledge.
Pierson, P. (1993). When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics, 45(4), 595–628. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950710.
Ragin, C., & Amoroso, L. (2011). Constructing social research: The unity and diversity of method (2nd Edition). SAGE Publications.
Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Schwalb, L., & Walk, H. (2007). Blackbox governance: local engagement on the rise. In Schwalb, L., & Walk, H. (Ed.), Local governance - mehr Transparenz und Bürgernähe? (pp. 7–22). Springer Nature.
Seto, K. C., Davis, S. J., Mitchell, R. B., Stokes, E. C., Unruh, G., & Urge-vorsatz, D. (2016). Carbon lock-in: Types, causes, and policy implications. Annual Review of Environmental and Resources. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934.
Seyfang, G. (2009). Green shots of sustainability: The 2009 UK Transition Movement Survey, (July), 1–14. https://transitionculture.org/wp-content/uploads/green-shoots-of-sustainability.pdf.
Schmid, B., Meister, T., Klagge, B., & Seidl, I. (2019). Energy Cooperatives and Municipalities in Local Energy Governance Arrangements in Switzerland and Germany. The Journal of Environment & Development, 29(1), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496519886013.
Soto-Oñate, D., Petrovics, D., & Bauwens, T. (2026). Post-growth meets polycentric governance: Toward an interdisciplinary research program. Ecological Economics, 242, Article 108891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108891.
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. American Sociological Association, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosa047.pub2.
Unruh, G. C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28, 817–830.
UVCW. (2018). La participation du citoyen. Retrieved 28 December, 2023, from https://www.uvcw.be/focus/participation-citoyenne/art-2419 (accessed on 28 December 2023).
Van de Graaf, T., & Sovacool, B. (2020). Global energy politics. Wiley, Polity.
Van der Heijden, J. (2018). City and subnational governance. In A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. Van Asselt, & J. Forster (Eds.), Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? (pp. 81–96). Cambridge University Press.
Vent de Raison. (2019). A propos de l’ASBL. Retrieved December 3, 2019, from http://ventderaison.com/vent-de-raison.
Żuk, P., & Szulecki, K. (2020). Unpacking the right-populist threat to climate action: Poland’s pro-governmental media on energy transition and climate change. Energy Research & Social Science, 66, 1–12, 101485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101485.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Loïc Cobut, Amandine Orsini (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
