Acknowledgement as a Precondition for Accommodation: Elite Intergroup Recognition in Belgium’s Federal Parliament (1961–2023) and the Impact of Decentralisation and Regionalist Party Strength
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54195/plc.25566Keywords:
Consociationalism, Spirit of accommodation, Belgium, Regionalist parties, DecentralisationAbstract
This paper revisits the role of elite accommodation in consociational democracies by shifting analytical attention to intergroup acknowledgement. We argue that a minimal level of recognition between societal groups is a necessary precondition for accommodation: Without genuine acknowledgement across societal group boundaries, accommodation cannot take place. We conceptualise referring to other MPs/MGs in parliamentary speeches as a measurable indicator of such acknowledgement. Focusing on Belgium, which has long been regarded as a prime example of elite accommodation but where it now appears to be under threat, this paper quantitatively examines this crucial condition. Using a new dataset of 22,236 speeches from Belgium’s federal parliament, covering investiture and State of the Union debates between 1961 and 2023, this paper shows that Belgian elites primarily refer to MPs/MGs of their own respective language groups. Furthermore, we show that the decentralisation of competences leads to less intergroup recognition and that, contrary to expectations, an increase in regionalist party strength in parliament leads to more intergroup recognition.
Downloads
References
Agarin, T., McCulloch, A., & Murtagh, C. (2018). Others in deeply divided societies: A research agenda. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 24(3), 299–310.
Almond, G. A. (1956). Comparative political systems. The Journal of Politics, 18(3), 391–409.
Andeweg, R. B. (2000). Consociational democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 509–536.
Blanckaert, B., & Caluwaerts, D. (2023). Do birds of a feather flock together? Patterns of ethnolinguistic group representation in the Brussels Capital Region. Swiss Political Science Review, 29(4), 379–398.
Blanckaert, B. (2025). Crossing the Rubicon: Strategies and motivations behind cross-ethnolinguistic vote-seeking in the Brussels Capital Region. Ethnopolitics, 24(4), 382–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2024.2322868
Bogaards, M. (1998). The favourable factors for consociational democracy: A review. European Journal of Political Research, 33, 475–496.
Bogaards, M., Helms, L., & Lijphart, A. (2019). The importance of consociationalism for twenty-first century politics and political science. Swiss Political Science Review, 25(4), 341–356.
Bogaards, M. (2026). The false promise of liberal consociations. Chinese Political Science Review, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-026-00337-2
Bouteca, N., & Peeters, W. (2023). Flemish nationalist parties: a qualified success? Centre on Constitutional Change. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/01HMVCC6GCVJHGSSQ9XQ4R1B7T
Caluwaerts, D., & Reuchamps, M. (2015). Combining federalism with consociationalism: Is Belgian consociational federalism digging its own grave? Ethnopolitics, 14(3), 277–295.
Caluwaerts, D., & Reuchamps, M. (2020). Still consociational: Belgian democracy, 50 Years after ‘the politics of accommodation’. Politics of the Low Countries, 2, 28.
Daalder, H. (1974). The consociational democracy theme. World Politics, 26(4), 604–621.
Dandoy, R., Dodeigne, J., Reuchamps, M., & Vandeleene, A. (2015). The new Belgian senate. A (dis)continued evolution of federalism in Belgium?. Representation, 51(3), 327–339.
de Vet, B. (2023). Members of the Belgian Chamber of Representatives (1995–2019), version 1 [Dataset]. https.//doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7801559.
Deschouwer, K. (2006). And the peace goes on? Consociational democracy and Belgian politics in the twenty-first century. West European Politics, 29(5), 895–911.
Deschouwer, K. (2011). The rise and fall of the Belgian regionalist parties. In E. Hepburn (Ed.), New challenges for stateless nationalist and regionalist parties (pp. 80–98). Routledge.
Deschouwer, K. (2013). The Belgian federation: A labyrinth state. In J. Loughlin, J. Kincaid, & W. Swenden (Eds.), Routledge handbook of regionalism & federalism (pp. 211–222). Routledge.
Deschouwer, K. & Temmerman, M. (2012). Elite behavior and elite communication in a divided society: The Belgian federal coalition formation of 2007. Journal of Language and Politics, 11(4), 500–520.
Deschouwer, K., Pilet, J.-B., van Haute, E. (2017). Party families in a split party system. In K. Deshouwer (Ed.), Mind the gap: Political participation and representation in Belgium (pp. 91–112). London: Routledge.
Devillers, S., Baudewyns, P., De Winter, L., Reuchamps, M. (2019). Who do you feel and what future do you want for Belgium? A comparison of candidates and voters’ identities and institutional preferences. In Vandeleene, A., De Winter, L., Baudewyns, P. (Eds.), Candidates, parties and voters in the Belgian partitocracy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96460-7_9
De Winter, L., & Türsan, H. (Eds.). (1998). Regionalist parties in Western Europe (pp. 190–235). Routledge.
De Winter, L. (2007). La recherche sur les identités ethno-territoriales en Belgique. Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée, 14(4), 575–595.
De Winter, L. & Dumont, P. (2021). Belgium: From highly constrained and complex bargaining settings to paralysis? In T. Bergmann, H. Back & J. Hellstrom (Eds.), Coalition governance in Western Europe (pp. 81-123). Oxford University Press.
Erk, J., & Anderson, L. (2009). The paradox of federalism: does self-rule accommodate or exacerbate ethnic divisions? Regional & Federal Studies, 19(2), 191–202.
Farag, M., Jung, H. R., Montini, I. C., De Fontenay, J. B., & Ladhar, S. (2023). What do we know about power sharing after 50 years? Government and Opposition, 58(4), 899–920.
Frateur, J., Bursens, P., & Meier, P. (2023). Exploring the relationship between federal reform and the representation of the people: The case of the Belgian house of representatives. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 53(4), 618–641.
Gamson, W. A. (2004). Bystanders, public opinion, and the media. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 242–261). Blackwell.
Horowitz, D. (2000). Ethnic groups in conflict. University of California Press.
Huyse L. (1970). Passiviteit, pacificatie en verzuiling in de Belgische politiek: Een sociologische studie. Standaard Wet. Uitg.
Jarrett, H. (2016). Beyond consociational theory: Identity in Northern Ireland and Brussels. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 22(4), 412–432.
John, P. (2025). Beyond groups? Consociational culture and the representation of cross-segmental interests. Swiss Political Science Review, 1–23. doi.org/10.1111/spsr.70004
Krauss, S., & Kroeber, C. (2021). How women in the executive influence government stability. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(9), 1372–1390.
Kymlicka, W. (2001). Politics in the vernacular: Nationalism, multiculturalism, and citizenship. Oxford University Press.
Lijphart, A. (1968). The politics of accommodation: Pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands. University of California Press.
Lijphart, A. (1969). Consociational democracy. World Politics, 21(2), 207–225.
Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in plural societies: A comparative exploration. Yale University Press.
Lijphart, A. (1981). Introduction: The Belgian example of cultural coexistence in a comparative perspective. In A. Lijphart (Ed.), Conflict and coexistence in Belgium: The dynamics of a culturally divided society (pp. 1–12). Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.
Lijphart, A. (2019). Deliberation and consociation: Joint pathways to peace in divided societies. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 15(3).
Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Schakel, A. H. (2008). Measuring regional authority. Regional and Federal Studies, 18(2-3), 111–121.
McCulloch, A. (2014). Consociational settlements in deeply divided societies: The liberal-corporate distinction. Democratization, 21(3), 501–518.
McGarry, J., & O’Leary, B. (2009). Must pluri-national federations fail? Ethnopolitics, 8(1), 5–25.
Reuchamps, M., Sinardet, D., Dodeigne, J., & Caluwaerts, D. (2017). Reforming Belgium’s federalism: Comparing the views of MPs and voters. Government and Opposition, 52(3), 460–482.
Sinardet, D. (2010). From consociational consciousness to majoritarian myth: Consociational democracy, multi-level politics and the Belgian case of Brussels-Halle-Vilvoorde. Acta Politica, 45(3), 346–369.
Steiner, J. (2009). In search of the consociational “spirit of accommodation”. In R. Taylor (Ed.), Consociational Theory (pp. 212–221). Routledge.
Steiner, J., & Jaramillo, M. C. (2019). How to arrive at peace in deeply divided societies? Using deliberation to refine consociational theory. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 15(3).
Stojanović, N. (2018). Political marginalization of “Others” in consociational regimes. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 12(2), 341–364.
Stojanović, N. (2020). Democracy, ethnoicracy and consociational democracy. International Political Science Review, 41(1), 30–43.
Swenden, W. (2006). Federalism and regionalism in Western Europe: A comparative and thematic analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Tierney, S. (2009). Federalism in a unitary state: A paradox too far? Regional and Federal Studies, 19, 237-53.
Vandenberghe, M. (2023a). Power-sharing and the paradox of federalism: Federalization and the evolution of ethno-territorial conflict in the case of Belgium (1979–2018). Ethnopolitics, 22(5), 485–506.
Vandenberghe, M. (2023b). Power-sharing and the paradox of federalism: Decentralization and ethno-territorial conflict in Belgian cabinets (1979–2018) (Doctoral dissertation, Ghent University).
Van der Hulst, M., & Muylle, K. (2017). Het federale parlement: Samenstelling, organisatie en werking. INNI Publishers.
Van der Velden, M. A. C. G., & Meijers, M. (2023). Don’t budge! The reputational cost of political compromises.
Van Haute, E., & Pilet, J. B. (2006). Regionalist parties in Belgium (VU, RW, FDF): Victims of their own success? Regional & Federal Studies, 16(3), 297–313.
Van Haute, E. (2016). Regionalist parties in Belgium (N-VA, FDF): A renewed success? In O. Mazzoleni & S. Mueller (Eds.), Regionalist parties in Western Europe (pp. 98–118). Routledge.
Van Schendelen, M. C. P. M. (1984). The views of Arend Lijphart and collected criticisms. Acta Politica, 19(1), 19–56.
Verleden, F. (2014). De erkenning van de fracties in het Kamerreglement (1962). Justitie en rechtsgeschiedenis. Presses universitaires de Louvain.
Witte, E., Gerard, E., Gubin, E., & Nandrin, J. (2003). Geschiedenis van de Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers, 1830–2002. Brussel, Kamer van volksvertegenwoordigers.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data were collected by the first author from the website of the Belgian Chamber of Representatives and are provided in the uploaded files. The compiled dataset is not yet publicly available.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ward Peeters, Els Lefever (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
